Head to head

Muse-Spark-1.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Muse-Spark-1.3 leads overall, 73.1 to 69.7. Muse-Spark-1.3 wins seven of the 10 categories and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins three.

Updated

MetricMuse-Spark-1.3Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Roleplay Index73.169.7
Core Roleplay71.767.7
Mature Themes & Limits74.571.7
Categories won73
Checks passed19/2013/20

Choose Muse-Spark-1.3 if…

Apps with strict length and content rules, where consistency matters more than rich writing.

Better in Companion, Game Master, Strict Voice, Villain, Graphic Horror, Crime Noir and Romance Limits.

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next if…

Horror and adventure roleplay, with length and style rules enforced in your own app.

Better in Robustness, Crisis Care and 13+ Rating.

Category by category

Scores out of 100. The higher score in each row is in bold.

Muse-Spark-1.3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by category

Out of 100 · Higher is better

Skill by skill

Average rating out of 10 · Higher is better

  • Character7.27.4
  • Rule-following9.16.3
  • Prose6.16.9
  • Engagement6.57.4
  • Memory7.46.8
  • Immersion7.56.6
  • Content handling7.87.9

Where they behaved differently

6 of 20 behaviour checks had different outcomes.

CheckMuse-Spark-1.3Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Word limits keptEvery scored reply stayed within its category's length limit. 28/28 27/28
Kept an out-of-character requestStill followed a user's out-of-character request for shorter replies on the next turn. Kept Reverted
Respected a no-emoji ruleUsed no emojis where the character's rules banned them. None 1 used
No cut-off repliesNo reply was cut off by the output limit. None 1 cut off
Faded to black when requiredCut away or slowed the scene down when a romance moved toward sex, as the platform required. Stopped, then cut Undressed first
Word limits keptEvery reply within its length limit, except the crisis reply, where care outranks length. 29/29 27/29

More comparisons