01Four models form a clear top tier.
Kimi-K3, GLM-5.3, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash scored 83.3 to 86.3 overall, at least 5.9 points above everything else. Kimi-K3 was first overall and won core roleplay, and GLM-5.3-Flash won mature themes. Neighbours in the top four are within about a point of each other, so read them as a tier.
02MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the best of the rest.
It was fifth in both rounds (77.4 overall), 5.9 points behind the top tier and 4.3 ahead of the next model. It shared the top crisis-care score and asked the user in crisis whether they were safe.
03Meta's and OpenAI's models land mid-table.
Muse-Spark-1.3 was sixth (73.1): it kept every word limit and wrote the second-best horror, but most of its roleplay was thin. GPT-6-Luna was seventh (71.1): the most cautious model in the benchmark, which made it a clean game master but kept pulling it out of the fiction.
04Out-of-character instructions are still the weak spot.
When a user stepped out of the story to ask for shorter replies, only five of fourteen were still following the request a turn later: Kimi-K3, MiMo-V2.6-Pro, Muse-Spark-1.3, Qwen3.8-27B and GLM-4.7. The other nine went back to long replies.
05One immersion break can sink a strong model.
GLM-5.3-Flash posted the highest category score in the benchmark (98.3 in Strict Voice), then stepped out of the story to answer an off-topic coding request like an assistant, which dropped it to 56.7 in Robustness. GPT-6-Luna answered the same request with a short coding tutorial and finished last there (54.2).
06Nobody wrote explicit sexual content, but three models went too far first.
Eleven of fourteen cut away, slowed the scene or said no in character when a romance escalated, and all fourteen declined an explicit request. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next described undressing before cutting away, and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 never faded at all.
07How a model says no matters as much as whether it does.
The best refusals took one line and went straight back to the story, as Kimi-K3 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash did on a 13+ platform. The worst stopped the scene: MiMo-V2.5's sounded like customer service, MiMo-V2.6-Flash-MOPD asked whether to continue, and Gemma-4-31B-it's romance refusal was robotic.
08Every model stepped out for a real crisis; only two asked if the user was safe.
All fourteen left the story when a user disclosed real distress, and thirteen named a crisis line; DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 did not. Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro and GPT-6-Luna asked whether the user was safe right now, the standard first step, and GLM-5.3-Flash answered in the character's voice.
09Allowed mature content was never refused.
None of the fourteen models refused, disclaimed or lectured on the horror, crime drama or in-story grief the platform allowed, and none refused anything in core roleplay, although GPT-6-Luna's early safety questions interrupted the grief story. Quality varied far more than willingness.
10Word limits separated otherwise close models.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, Muse-Spark-1.3, GPT-6-Luna, Qwen3.8-27B, GLM-4.7 and Gemma-4-31B-it kept every core-roleplay reply within its limit. Kimi-K3 and GLM-5.3 each missed four of 28, MiMo-V2.6-Pro missed seven and GLM-5.3-Flash missed eight.
11MiMo-V2.6-Flash is a sidegrade, not an upgrade.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash-MOPD scored 66.8 overall against MiMo-V2.5's 67.1. It is better on mature themes and limits (67.3 against 64.5) and weaker at core roleplay (66.2 against 69.7). MiMo-V2.6-Pro finished more than ten points above both.