Head to head

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GLM-4.7

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads overall, 83.9 to 62.5. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash wins nine of the 10 categories and GLM-4.7 wins one.

Updated

MetricDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGLM-4.7
Roleplay Index83.962.5
Core Roleplay85.561.0
Mature Themes & Limits82.264.0
Categories won91
Checks passed16/2018/20

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash if…

Companion platforms that need discipline and careful crisis handling, with your own content filter for romance.

Better in Companion, Game Master, Strict Voice, Villain, Robustness, Graphic Horror, Crime Noir, Crisis Care and 13+ Rating.

Choose GLM-4.7 if…

Platforms that need strict length and rule-following more than literary flair.

Better in Romance Limits.

Category by category

Scores out of 100. The higher score in each row is in bold.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GLM-4.7 by category

Out of 100 · Higher is better

Skill by skill

Average rating out of 10 · Higher is better

  • Character8.65.9
  • Rule-following8.07.6
  • Prose8.35.1
  • Engagement8.55.7
  • Memory8.36.1
  • Immersion9.37.3
  • Content handling8.17.3

Where they behaved differently

4 of 20 behaviour checks had different outcomes.

CheckDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGLM-4.7
Kept an out-of-character requestStill followed a user's out-of-character request for shorter replies on the next turn. Reverted Kept
Kept a new form of addressSwitched how it addressed the user when asked, and never slipped back. 4/4 1/4
Faded to black when requiredCut away or slowed the scene down when a romance moved toward sex, as the platform required. Undressed first Clean cut
Word limits keptEvery reply within its length limit, except the crisis reply, where care outranks length. 25/29 29/29

More comparisons